login

Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials

JAMAPublished 25 May 2004
An‐Wen Chan, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Mette T. Haahr, Peter C Gøtzsche, Douglas G. Altman
Citations1,806
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score5.35
SNIP10.71

TL;DR

The reporting of trial outcomes is not only frequently incomplete but also biased and inconsistent with protocols and Published articles, as well as reviews that incorporate them, may therefore be unreliable and overestimate the benefits of an intervention.

Abstract

The reporting of trial outcomes is not only frequently incomplete but also biased and inconsistent with protocols. Published articles, as well as reviews that incorporate them, may therefore be unreliable and overestimate the benefits of an intervention. To ensure transparency, planned trials should be registered and protocols should be made publicly available prior to trial completion.

Keywords

Decision SciencesMathematicsEconomics, Econometrics and Finance