The Processes of Public Accountability
Australian Journal of Public AdministrationPublished 1 March 1997
Richard Mulgan
Citations127
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.74
SNIP1.14
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
There is a sameness to writing on public accountability which does not always do justice to the subject. With responsibility and accountability conflated and an idealised version of the Westminster model held up as the only test, ministers constantly appear irresponsible. Yet a more complex account of public accountability is possible, one which acknowledges that no single institution can undertake the important work of ensuring accountability from ministers, the parliament and public servants.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Medical Entomology and ZoologyPublic sector management in Australia
147 Citations1992John Wanna, Ciaran O’Faircheallaigh +1 more
Australian Politics: Realities in Conflict
100 Citations1991Hugh V. Emy, Owen E. Hughes
Administration & SocietyWhat is Bureaucratic Accountability and How can We Measure it?
94 Citations1990Michael G. O'Loughlin
Allen & Unwin eBooksPolitical leadership in an age of constraint : bureaucratic politics under Hawke and Keating
37 Citations1992Colin Campbell, John Halligan
The Australian QuarterlyAccountability Reform in Australia: The WA Inc Royal Commission in Context
5 Citations1993Bruce Stone
