Can neural networks do better than the Vapnik-Chervonenkis bounds?
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
A series of careful numerical experiments are described, which find that, in some cases, the average generalization is significantly better than the VC bound: the approach to perfect performance is exponential in the number of examples m, rather than the 1/m result of the bound.
Abstract
We describe a series of careful numerical experiments which measure the average generalization capability of neural networks trained on a variety of simple functions. These experiments are designed to test whether average generalization performance can surpass the worst-case bounds obtained from formal learning theory using the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension (Blumer et al., 1989). We indeed find that, in some cases, the average generalization is significantly better than the VC bound: the approach to perfect performance is exponential in the number of examples m, rather than the 1/m result of the bound. In other cases, we do find the 1/m behavior of the VC bound, and in these cases, the numerical prefactor is closely related to prefactor contained in the bound.
