The Relative Tax Benefits of Alternative Call Features in Corporate Debt
Journal of Financial and Quantitative AnalysisPublished 1 March 1985
Ivan E. Brick, Buckner A. Wallingford
Citations19
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.46
SNIP2.34
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper examines the differential tax treatment of the borrower and lender at the time debt is called as a potential explanation for the widespread existence of call provisions in corporate debt. This tax effect alone cannot explain the standard call feature because greater tax benefits may be derived for bonds callable at market prices. The equilibrium implications of the model allowing for tax arbitrage opportunities both at the corporate level and the individual level also are considered.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Journal of Political EconomyThe Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities
29,429 Citations1973Fischer Black, Myron S. Scholes
Journal of Financial EconomicsThe valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes
3,030 Citations1976John C. Cox, Stephen A. Ross
Journal of Financial EconomicsDividends and taxes
738 Citations1978Merton H. Miller, Myron S. Scholes
The Journal of FinanceA RATIONALE FOR DEBT MATURITY STRUCTURE AND CALL PROVISIONS IN THE AGENCY THEORETIC FRAMEWORK
606 Citations1980Amir Barnea, Robert A. Haugen +1 more
