The significance of heart rate for behavior: A critique of Lacey's hypothesis.
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This examination consists of a review of relatively direct assessments of the validity of the hypothesis, of the status of the "intake-rejection" dimension and difficulties in its application, and of the relative merits of viewing cardiovascular events as causes rather than effects in psychologically relevant tasks.
Abstract
It is the purpose of this paper to examine critically Lacey's (1959, 1967; Laccy, Kagan, Laccy, & Moss, 1963) recent hypothesis about the relation between cardiovascular responses—especially heart rate—and performance on sundry tasks. This examination consists of a review of relatively direct assessments of the validity of the hypothesis, of the status of the intake-rejection dimension and difficulties in its application, and of the relative merits of viewing cardiovascular events as causes rather than effects in psychologically relevant tasks.
