An expected value model of social power: predictions for selected exchange networks
Social NetworksPublished 1 September 1992
Noah E. Friedkin
Citations116
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.17
SNIP1.50
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The paper carries forward a line of work on an expected value model of social power and illustrates the application of this model to selected networks of social exchange.
Keywords
Social SciencesPhysics and Astronomy
Social NetworksCentrality in social networks conceptual clarification
16,883 Citations1978Linton C. Freeman
Three distinct intuitive conceptions of centrality are uncovered and existing measures are refined to embody these conceptions, one absolute and one relative measure of the centrality of positions in a network and one reflecting the degree of centralization of the entire network.
American Journal of SociologyThe Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results
940 Citations1983Karen S. Cook, Richard M. Emerson +2 more
A distinction between two different principles of "connection" in social networks suggests that current measures of centrality might predict power in one type of network but not in the other, and a first step toward a fusion of power-dependence theory and structural centrality in a way which might be general across networks of both types is offered.
American Journal of SociologyTheoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures
704 Citations1991Noah E. Friedkin
American Sociological ReviewPower Relations in Exchange Networks
450 Citations1988Barry Markovsky, David Willer +1 more
