RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PAY, RACE, SEX, OCCUPATIONAL PRESTIGE, SUPERVISION, WORK AUTONOMY, AND JOB SATISFACTION IN A NATIONAL SAMPLE
Personnel PsychologyPublished 1 September 1977
Charles N. Weaver
Citations110
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score5.41
SNIP3.58
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Published evidence, based largely on bivariate methods of analysis, generally suggests that pay, race, occupational prestige, supervisory status, and work autonomy are associated with job satisfaction and that sex is not. Regression analysis of a representative sample of U.S. workers, which partialled out the effects of a number of other variables, affirms that supervisory status makes an independent contribution to job satisfaction and that sex is unrelated, but suggests that the zero‐order effects of pay, race, occupational prestige, and work autonomy are spurious.
Keywords
PsychologyHealth ProfessionsBusiness, Management and Accounting
Physical TherapyPay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View
453 Citations1972Gretchen Veigh
Academy of Management JournalCORRELATES OF JOB SATISFACTION: SOME EVIDENCE FROM THE NATIONAL SURVEYS.
47 Citations1974Charles N. Weaver
