An economic analysis of USDA erosion control programs: A new perspective
Published 1 January 1986
Roger W. Strohbehn
Citations23
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Soil conservation programs would be more effective if they focused more on controlling erosion on highly erodible land. Significant effort and funding for current programs are directed to cropland that erodes at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Yet, the benefits of erosion control measures exceed the costs involved only on land eroding at about 15 tons per acre per year and above. More benefits from controlling erosion on cropland are offsite, realized away from the cropland itself, indicating the significance of public benefits from soil conservation efforts
Keywords
Earth and Planetary SciencesAgricultural and Biological SciencesEnvironmental Science
Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning
7,313 Citations1978W. H. Wischmeier, D. D. Smith
Journal of Soil and Water ConservationSoil loss tolerance: Maintenance of long-term soil productivity
34 Citations1984Francis J. Pierce, W. E. Larson +1 more
ASA special publicationErosion Tolerance for Cropland: Application of the Soil Survey Data Base
19 Citations1982Robert B. Grossman, C.R. Berdanier
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)CONSERVATION AND EROSION CONTROL COSTS IN THE UNITED STATES
2 Citations1985George A. Pavelis, Pavelis, George A.
