Problems of Definitional Dependency: The Case of Administrative Intensity
Social ForcesPublished 1 September 1973
John H. Freeman, Jerrold E. Kronenfeld
Citations75
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.57
SNIP1.85
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In the process of defining their variables, researchers often produce dependencies between them by redundantly including component variables. The result is that a null hypothesis of “no relationship” cannot be tested by comparing the observed correlation with zero. The potentially misleading consequences of this practice are discussed in a detailed analysis of the size-administrative intensity literature. Suggestions are made for dealing with the problem.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision SciencesComputer Science
Medical Entomology and ZoologyIndustrial Organization: Theory and Practice
1,909 Citations1966Joan Woodward
American Sociological ReviewThe Structure of Small Bureaucracies
176 Citations1966Peter M. Blau, Wolf Heydebrand +1 more
Administrative Science QuarterlyRelationship of Organizational Size to Complexity and Coordination
77 Citations1970S. R. Klatzky
Sociological QuarterlyThe Administrative Component in Complex Organizations
14 Citations1972Thomas F. James
