A response to ?On Measuring Ethical Judgments?
Journal of Business EthicsPublished 1 February 1995
R. Eric Reidenbach, Donald P. Robin
Citations17
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.04
SNIP3.01
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This article discusses the major criticisms posed in “On Measuring Ethical Judgments” concerning our ethics scale development work. We agree that the authors of the criticism do engage in what they accurately refer to as “armchair theorizing.” We point out the errors in their comments.
Keywords
Decision SciencesHealth ProfessionsNeuroscience
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceAn Application and Extension of a Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Marketing Practices and Marketing Groups
223 Citations1991R. Eric Reidenbach, Donald P. Robin +1 more
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceAn application and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale to selected marketing practices and marketing groups
181 Citations1991R. Eric Reidenbach, Donald P. Robin +1 more
Journal of Business EthicsOn measuring ethical judgments
47 Citations1993Robert Boyd Skipper, Michael R. Hyman
Journal of AdvertisingEthical Judgments about Wartime Ads Depicting Combat
40 Citations1992Richard Tansey, Michael R. Hyman +1 more
