login

Language learning: Cues or rules?

Journal of Memory and LanguagePublished 1 June 1989
Brian MacWhinney, Jared Leinbach, Roman Taraban, Janet L. McDonald
Citations245
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.80
SNIP2.03

Abstract

Child language researchers have often taken gender and case paradigms to be interesting test cases for theories of language learning. In this paper we develop a computational model of the acquisition of the gender, number, and case paradigm for the German definite article. The computational formalism used is a connectionist algorithm developed by Rumelhart, Hinton, and Williams (1986. In D. Rumelhart & J. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing; Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Three models are developed. In the first two, various cues to gender studied by Köpcke and Zubin (1983, Zeitschrift fur germanistiche Linguistik, 11, 166–182; 1984, Linguistiche Berichte, 93, 26–50) are entered by hand. In the third, the simulation is given only the raw phonological features of the stem. Despite the elimination of the hand-crafting of the units, the third model outperformed the first two in both training and generalization. All three models showed a good match to the developmental data of Mills (1986, The acquisition of gender: a study of English and German. Berlin: Springer-Verlag) and MacWhinney (1978, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43, whole No. 1). Advantages of a connectionist approach over older theories are discussed.

Keywords

PsychologySocial Sciences