Technology-Trading Coalitions in Supergames
The RAND Journal of EconomicsPublished 1 January 1997
B. Curtis Eaton, Mukesh Eswaran
Citations43
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.17
SNIP2.43
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We attempt to explain the observation that rival firms often share their technologies. We show that the trading of technical information over the long haul can be sustained as an equilibrium in supergames. The strategy of ejection of a cheating firm from a technology-trading coalition, followed by the continuation of technology trading by the noncheating members, better facilitates trading than does a strategy in which cheating results in the dissolution of the coalition. Technology trading is often welfare improving, and firms may form small coalitions.
Keywords
Decision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
The Review of Economic StudiesA Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames
1,782 Citations1971James W. Friedman
Journal of Economic TheoryExtremal equilibria of oligopolistic supergames
683 Citations1986Dilip Abreu
Cambridge University Press eBooksDuopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand
554 Citations1989Xavier Vives
The Review of Economic StudiesExchange of Cost Information in Oligopoly
429 Citations1986Carl Shapiro
American Economic ReviewDeterrence by Market Sharing: A Strategic Incentive for Licensing
343 Citations1984Nancy Gallini
The Bell Journal of EconomicsFulfilled Expectations Cournot Duopoly with Information Acquisition and Release
313 Citations1982William Novshek, Hugo Sonnenschein
