Downstream mergers and producer's capacity choice: why bake a larger pie when getting a smaller slice?
The RAND Journal of EconomicsPublished 1 December 2007Open access
João Montez
Citations31
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.17
SNIP2.43
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In this article, the effect of downstream horizontal mergers on the upstream producer's capacity choice was studied. Contrary to conventional wisdom, I find a nonmonotonic relationship: horizontal mergers induce a higher upstream capacity if the cost of capacity is low, and a lower upstream capacity if this cost is high. This result is explained by decomposing the total effect into two competing effects: a change in holdup and a change in bargaining erosion.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Journal of Political EconomyProperty Rights and the Nature of the Firm
5,369 Citations1990Oliver Hart, John Moore
American Economic ReviewContract duration and relationship-specific investments: Empirical evidence from coal markets
958 Citations1987Paul L. Joskow
EconometricaInvestment and Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts: A Nash Bargaining Approach
949 Citations1984Paul A. Grout
Revue économiqueAmerican Capitalism. The Concept of Countervailing Power
856 Citations1954Raymond Barre, Jim Galbraith
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsHandbook of game theory with economic applications
527 Citations1999Robert J. Aumann, Sergiu Hart
This chapter discusses the foundations of strategic equilibrium, values of the shapley value, and some other economic applications of the value in game theory and experimental Gaming.
American Economic ReviewOpportunism in Multilateral Vertical Contracting: Nondiscrimination, Exclusivity, and Uniformity: Comment
377 Citations2004Leslie M. Marx, Greg Shaffer
SSRN Electronic JournalOrganizational Design and Technology Choice Under Intrafirm Bargaining
276 Citations1996Lars Stole, Jeffrey Zwiebel
European Economic ReviewBuyer power and supplier incentives
248 Citations2006Roman Inderst, Christian Wey
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsDoes Asset Ownership Always Motivate Managers? Outside Options and the Property Rights Theory of the Firm
234 Citations1998David de Meza, Benjamin Lockwood
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpportunism in Multilateral Vertical Contracting: Nondiscrimination, Exclusivity, and Uniformity.
228 CitationsMcAfee, R Preston, Schwartz, Marius
The Economic JournalRetail Mergers, Buyer Power and Product Variety
181 Citations2007Roman Inderst, Greg Shaffer
EconometricaRobust Predictions for Bilateral Contracting with Externalities
163 Citations2003Ilya Segal, Michael D. Whinston
American Economic ReviewNoncooperative Bargaining, Hostages, and Optimal Asset Ownership
127 Citations1998Stephen W.K. Chiu
SSRN Electronic JournalVertical Integration in the Presence of Upstream Competition
114 Citations2002Catherine de Fontenay, Joshua S. Gans
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)Vertical Integration in the Presence of Upstream Competition
109 Citations2004Catherine C. de Fontenay, Joshua S. Gans
SSRN Electronic JournalNoncooperative Bargaining, Hostages, and Optimal Asset Ownership
81 Citations1998Yi‐Bin Chiu
Journal of Industrial EconomicsBilateral Bargaining with Externalities
74 Citations2014Catherine C. de Fontenay, Joshua S. Gans
SSRN Electronic JournalBilateral Bargaining with Externalities
45 Citations2004Catherine de Fontenay, Joshua S. Gans
International Journal of Industrial OrganizationVertical foreclosure versus downstream competition with capital precommitment
13 Citations2003Pio Baake, Ulrich Kamecke +1 more
Countervailing Power and Upstream Innovation
7 Citations2005Roman Inderst, Christian Wey
