The Effects of Group Size on Cognitive Effort and Evaluation
Personality and Social Psychology BulletinPublished 1 July 1977
Richard E. Petty, Stephen G. Harkins, Kipling D. Williams, Bibb Latané
Citations170
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.17
SNIP1.85
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Students rated a poem and an editorial believing that they alone were responsible, that they were one of four persons responsible, or that they were one of sixteen persons responsible for evaluating the communications. As predicted, group mem bers reported putting less effort into the assessment than indi viduals, and this diffusion of effort followed an inverse power function. In addition, individuals evaluated the communications more favorably than persons who thought they shared the evalu ation responsibility.
Keywords
Decision SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyThe Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance
462 Citations1974Alan G. Ingham, George Levinger +2 more
Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyOpinion change as a result of effortfully drawing a counterattitudinal conclusion
23 Citations1970Darwyn E. Linder, Stephen Worchel
