Describing race, ethnicity, and culture in medical research
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
If researchers want to be able to compare results of studies now and in the future a framework is needed for the classification of ethnic or cultural groups, and the nearest to an agreed classification in the United Kingdom are the categories used by the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys in the 1991 census.
Abstract
The terminology of race, ethnicity, and culture is a source of continuing debate and will change because of fashion and politics.1 Given our diversity, the fact that ethnicity is now most often self classified, and that both ethnicity and culture are dynamic it seems unlikely that an agreed taxonomy can be achieved. But if researchers want to be able to compare results of studies now and in the future a framework is needed for the classification of ethnic or cultural groups. The nearest we have to an agreed classification in the United Kingdom are the categories used by the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys in the 1991 census.2 This is a pragmatic classification that balances ease of collection against a need to produce data on the population.3 It is of limited use as a measure of sociocultural differences.3 This leaves a void in which there are many different terms used for groups. For instance, a black Baptist born in the UK but whose parents were …
