Generosity, anonymity, gender
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationPublished 6 September 2005
Martin Dufwenberg, Astri Muren
Citations246
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.44
SNIP1.31
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We examine experimentally how a person's generosity depends on the degree of anonymity between giver and recipient, as well as on the parties' sexes. Less is given when the giver is paid on stage rather than in private; men receive less than women; fewer men than women give non-zero amounts. The results suggest that it may be problematic to organize experimental data in terms of social distance.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Revue économiqueNonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
35,492 Citations1958Henri Guitton, Sidney Siegel
Games and Economic BehaviorFairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
2,396 Citations1994Robert Forsythe, Joël L. Horowitz +2 more
Games and Economic BehaviorPreferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games
1,723 Citations1994Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin McCabe +2 more
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsWhich is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism
1,437 Citations2001James Andreoni, Lise Vesterlund
American Economic ReviewSocial Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply
1,192 Citations1999Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin McCabe +1 more
The Economic JournalAre Women Less Selfish Than Men?: Evidence From Dictator Experiments
1,028 Citations1998Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsDiscrimination in a Segmented Society: An Experimental Approach
946 Citations2001Chaim Fershtman, Uri Gneezy
Journal of Public EconomicsThe impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations
657 Citations2003Mari Rege, Kjetil Telle
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationProbability and Statistics.
633 Citations1978Donald A. Berry, Morris H. DeGroot
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationWhat's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games
556 Citations2008Gary Charness, Uri Gneezy
American Economic ReviewSocial Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment
520 Citations1999Iris Bohnet, Bruno S. Frey
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationThe sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games
492 Citations1999Iris Bohnet, Bruno S. Frey
International Journal of Game TheoryDictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness
481 Citations1998Gary E. Bolton, Elena Katok +1 more
A hypothetical decision procedure is proposed, based on the notion that dictator giving originates with personal and social rules that effectively constrain self-interested behavior, that provides a link between dictator behavior and a broader class of laboratory phenomena.
Economics LettersAn experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior
290 Citations1995Gary E. Bolton, Elena Katok
Journal of Economic PsychologyShare and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving
271 Citations2003Avner Ben‐Ner, Fanmin Kong +1 more
Public ChoiceModeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test
216 Citations2004Norman Frohlich, Joe Oppenheimer +1 more
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationSome doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: the costs of anonymity
133 Citations2001Norman Frohlich, Joe Oppenheimer +1 more
Games and Economic BehaviorGender-Based Focal Points
109 Citations2000Håkan J. Holm
The subjects behaved significantly more “hawkish” in an experimental battle of the sexes game when the co-player was a woman compared to when it was a man.
Journal of Educational PsychologyHow to promote social approval: Effects of audience and achievement outcome on publicly communicated attributions.
82 Citations1993Jaana Juvonen, Tamera B. Murdock
Economics LettersNon-reciprocal altruism in dictator games
71 Citations2000Magnus Johannesson, Björn Persson
Experimental EconomicsChoosing Bargaining Partners—An Experimental Study on the Impact of Information About Income, Status and Gender
42 Citations2005Håkan J. Holm, Peter Engseld
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsDiscrimination by Gender and Social Distance
34 Citations2002Martin Dufwenberg, Astri Muren
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsChoosing Bargaining Partners - An experimental study on the impact of information about income and gender
6 Citations2001Håkan J. Holm, Peter Engseld
