Volunteers and pseudo-volunteers: The effect of recruitment method in dictator experiments
Experimental EconomicsPublished 1 October 2000
Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman
Citations107
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.09
SNIP1.55
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We report the results of experiments that test for behavioral differences between volunteer subjects recruited in the usual way and pseudo-volunteer subjects in experiments conducted during class time. In a series of dictator games, we find that psuedo-volunteers are more generous on average than their volunteer counterparts, and that non-monetary factors such as religious or altruistic preferences have a greater effect on the giving behavior of pseudo-volunteers.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision Sciences
The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework
1,594 Citations1999Colin F. Camerer, Robin M. Hogarth +2 more
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsWhich is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism
1,437 Citations2001James Andreoni, Lise Vesterlund
CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology)The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework \n
1,383 Citations1999Colin F. Camerer, Robin M. Hogarth
Personality and Individual DifferencesThe altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale
1,031 Citations1981J. Philippe Rushton, Roland D. Chrisjohn +1 more
Journal of Public EconomicsRebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter?
381 Citations2003Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman
Journal of Statistical Computation and SimulationAn omnibus test for the two-sample problem using the empirical characteristic function
171 Citations1986T. W. Epps, Kenneth J. Singleton
Personality and Individual DifferencesExtraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism and self-reported delinquency: Evidence from eight separate samples
131 Citations1981J. Philippe Rushton, Roland D. Chrisjohn
Journal of Public EconomicsTax incentives and charitable giving: evidence from a panel of taxpayers
123 Citations1980Charles T. Clotfelter
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsGiving according to GARP: an experimental study of rationality and altruism
75 Citations1997James Andreoni, John H. Miller
National Bureau of Economic ResearchThe Impact of Tax Reform on Charitable Giving: A 1989 Perspective
39 Citations1990Charles T. Clotfelter
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsThe Impact of Tax Reform on Charitable Giving: A 1989 Perspective
21 Citations1990Charles T. Clotfelter
