Crafting mixed‐method evaluation designs
New Directions for EvaluationPublished 1 June 1997
Valerie J. Caracelli, Jennifer C. Greene
Citations330
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.48
SNIP0.66
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract Two classes of mixed‐method, mixed‐paradigm evaluation designs are defined and described.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision Sciences
Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach
11,632 Citations1996Joseph A. Maxwell
Educational Evaluation and Policy AnalysisToward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
5,311 Citations1989Jennifer C. Greene, Valerie J. Caracelli +1 more
Evaluation and Program PlanningAn introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation
1,502 Citations1989William M. K. Trochim
Each step in the process is described, major methodological issues and problems are considered, and computer programs which can be used to accomplish the process are discussed.
Utilization-focused evaluation : the new century text
1,474 Citations1997Michael Quinn Patton
Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles
1,173 Citations1989John Brewer, Albert Hunter
Educational ResearcherQualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research
924 Citations1981David Brinberg, Thomas D. Cook +1 more
Educational ResearcherMeaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
706 Citations1987William A. Firestone
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationInteractional Troubles in Face-to-Face Survey Interviews
501 Citations1990Lucy Suchman, Brigitte Jordan
Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives.
232 Citations1994Charles S. Reichardt, Sharon F. Rallis
New Directions for EvaluationThe logic of evaluation and evaluation practice
100 Citations1995Michael Scriven
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareCross-design Synthesis:<i>A New Form of Meta-analysis for Combining Results from Randomized Clinical Trials and Medical-practice Databases</i>
78 Citations1993Judith Droitcour, George Silberman +1 more
Cross-design synthesis is a new (and still evolving) strategy for providing quantitative results that capture the strengths and minimize the weaknesses of different kinds of research.
Medical Entomology and ZoologyTools for the field: methodologies handbook for gender analysis in agriculture.
76 Citations1994Hilary Sims Feldstein, Janice Jiggins
New Directions for Program EvaluationIssues in constructing program theory
73 Citations1990Huey-Tsyh Chen
Educational Evaluation: Ethnography in Theory, Practice, and Politics.
62 Citations1986David M. Fetterman, Mary Anne Pitman
Evaluation and Program PlanningThe conceptual framework of the theory-driven perspective
57 Citations1989Huey-Tsyh Chen
New Directions for Program EvaluationTaking uncertainty into account when estimating effects
36 Citations1987Charles S. Reichardt, Harry F. Gollob
New Directions for Program EvaluationThe quantitative‐qualitative debate: Possibilities for integration
31 Citations1994Terry E. Hedrick