login

“Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism

Journal of DocumentationPublished 1 February 2005
Sanna Talja, Kimmo Tuominen, Reijo Savolainen
Citations363
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.79
SNIP1.63

TL;DR

The basic premises of three metatheories that represent important or emerging perspectives on information seeking, retrieval and knowledge formation in information science: constructivism, collectivism, and constructionism are described.

Abstract

Purpose Describes the basic premises of three metatheories that represent important or emerging perspectives on information seeking, retrieval and knowledge formation in information science: constructivism, collectivism, and constructionism. Design/methodology/approach Presents a literature‐based conceptual analysis. Pinpoints the differences between the positions in their conceptions of language and the nature and origin of knowledge. Findings Each of the three metatheories addresses and solves specific types of research questions and design problems. The metatheories thus complement one another. Each of the three metatheories encourages and constitutes a distinctive type of research and learning. Originality/value Outlines each metatheory's specific fields of application.

Keywords

Computer Science