login

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation

BMJPublished 26 February 2000Open access
Alejandro R. Jadad
Citations258
View PDF

TL;DR

Most reviews published in peer reviewed journals or funded by industry have serious methodological flaws that limit their value to guide decisions, but Cochrane reviews are more rigorous and better reported than those published inpeer reviewed journals.

Abstract

Most reviews published in peer reviewed journals or funded by industry have serious methodological flaws that limit their value to guide decisions. Cochrane reviews are more rigorous and better reported than those published in peer reviewed journals.

Keywords

Decision SciencesMedicineNeuroscience