How best to measure surgical quality? comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The AHRQ-PSI as applied to postoperative patients is a poor measure of quality performance and the ACS-NSQIP as a validated, risk-adjusted, clinically derived data methodology to compare observed to expected outcomes after a wide variety of operations is compared.
Abstract
AHRQ-PSI algorithms identified less than a third of the ACS-NSQIP clinically important adverse events. Furthermore, the AHRQ-PSI identified a large number of events with no corresponding clinically important adverse outcomes. The sensitivity of the AHRQ-PSI for detecting clinically relevant adverse events identified by the ACS-NSQIP varied widely. The AHRQ-PSI as applied to postoperative patients is a poor measure of quality performance.
