login

Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services ResearchPublished 18 October 2010Open access
Enola K. Proctor, Hiie Silmere, Ramesh Raghavan, Peter S. Hovmand, Greg Aarons, Alicia C. Bunger
Citations8,795
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.26
SNIP1.40
View PDF

TL;DR

A heuristic, working “taxonomy” of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes—acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability—along with their nominal definitions is proposed.

Abstract

An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of "implementation outcomes" distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working "taxonomy" of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes-acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability-along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.

Keywords

Health Professions