The Effects of Appeals, Anonymity, and Feedback on Mail Survey Response Patterns from Salespeople
Journal of the Academy of Marketing SciencePublished 1 June 1989
Pradeep K. Tyagi
Citations51
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.90
SNIP4.39
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The effects of manipulation of appeal types, anonymity/nonanonymity, and the promiselno promise of feedback of research results on response patterns were examined using a sales population. The results indicate that the use of these techniques can enhance the response patterns from salespeople. Specifically, the egoistic appeal, the interaction of egoistic appeal with anonymity, and feedback were shown to influence response rate, response speed, and response completeness.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Organizational Behavior and Human PerformanceMotivation through the design of work: test of a theory
8,746 Citations1976J. Richard Hackman, Greg R. Oldham
Administrative Science QuarterlyA Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness
2,956 Citations1971Robert J. House
Journal of Marketing ResearchMail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review
859 Citations1975Leslie Lazar Kanuk, Conrad Berenson
Public Opinion QuarterlyStimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review
401 Citations1975Arnold S. Linsky
Academy of Management JournalMotivation and Participation: An Integration.
164 Citations1973T. R. Mitchell
Social ForcesQuestionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological Analysis
117 Citations1969D. J. Champion, Alan M. Sear
Journal of Marketing ResearchBroadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys
103 Citations1976Michael J. Houston, Neil M. Ford
Journal of Marketing ResearchOn the Analysis of Qualitative Data in Marketing Research
100 Citations1977Paul E. Green, Frank J. Carmone +1 more
Journal of Marketing ResearchThe Effects of Source and Appeal on Mail Survey Response Patterns
99 Citations1977Michael J. Houston, John R. Nevin
Journal of Marketing ResearchA Reassessment of the Effects of Appeals on Response to Mail Surveys
90 Citations1980Terry L. Childers, William M. Pride +1 more
Public Opinion QuarterlyPersonalizing Mail Questionnaire Correspondence
73 Citations1970Alan R. Andreasen
Journal of Marketing ResearchThe Negative Effects of Personalization on Response Patterns in Mail Surveys
62 Citations1975Michael J. Houston, Robert W. Jefferson
Efforts to minimize the severity of these problems have resulted in methodological inquiries covering a wide range of variables, but less attention has centered on whether two or more simultaneously applied variables significantly interact in their effects on any of the above problems.
Public Opinion QuarterlyAn Experimental Study of Factors Affecting Response to a Mail Survey of Beginning Teachers
55 Citations1961Ward S. Mason, Robert J. Dressel +1 more
Public Opinion QuarterlyThe Appeals of Anonymity in Questionnaire Response
38 Citations1961Leonard I. Pearlin
Journal of MarketingA Marketer'S Guide to Log-Linear Models for Qualitative Data Analysis
24 Citations1980Wayne S. DeSarbo, David K. Hildebrand
