Radiocarbon Dating of Bone: To Collagen and Beyond
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Concerns about the accuracy of 14C values obtained on seriously collagen-degraded bones (eg, Gillespie 1989; Stafford et al 1990, 1991) maintain the negative connotations associated with this sample type.
Abstract
Discussions concerning the reliability of 14C-based age determinations on bone have occurred throughout all four decades of radiocarbon research. The accuracy of bone 14C determinations was questioned by Libby even before the first bone 14C analysis was undertaken. Despite the amount of attention given to the exclusion of contamination by isolation and purification of specific chemical and, most recently, molecular fractions of bone, a tradition of skepticism concerning the general reliability of bone 14C values remains (eg, Brown 1988: 225). Concerns about the accuracy of 14C values obtained on seriously collagen-degraded bones (eg, Gillespie 1989; Stafford et al 1990, 1991) maintain the negative connotations associated with this sample type.KeywordsBone SampleRadiocarbon DateAccelerator Mass SpectrometryAccelerator Mass SpectrometryHuman SkeletonThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
