Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The study clearly indicates that the common practice of stripwise precommercial thinning is unjustified, and the justification of heavy 'chessboard' thinning (with pruning) depends on whether the potential reduction in rotation length and the improvement in wood quality outweigh the discounted costs of pre-commercial thinning and selection and pruning of crop trees.
Abstract
We review some of the literature on semi-supervised learning in this paper. Traditional classifiers need labeled data (feature / label pairs) to train. Labeled instances however are often difficult, expensive, or time consuming to obtain, as they require the efforts of experienced human annotators. Meanwhile unlabeled data may be relatively easy to collect, but there has been few ways to use them. Semi-supervised learning addresses this problem by using large amount of unlabeled data, together with the labeled data, to build better classifiers. Because semi-supervised learning requires less human effort and gives higher \naccuracy, it is of great interest both in theory and in practice.
