Integrating qualitative methods in a predominantly quantitative evaluation: A case study and some reflections
New Directions for EvaluationPublished 1 June 1997
Melvin M. Mark, Irwin Feller, Scott B. Button
Citations25
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.48
SNIP0.66
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract A review of qualitative methods used in a predominantly quantitative evaluation indicated a variety of roles for such a mixing of methods, including framing initial questions and method choices, revising evaluation questions during the inquiry, assessing the validity of measures, assessing adaptations in program implementation, and gauging the proper degree of uncertainty and generalizability of one's conclusions. These functions are considered in light of the stances on mixing paradigms that Greene and Caracelli describe in Chapter One.
Keywords
Decision Sciences
Canadian Journal of Program EvaluationFourth-Generation Evaluation
5,992 Citations1988Anne Neufeld, Alan Ryan
Educational Evaluation and Policy AnalysisToward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
5,311 Citations1989Jennifer C. Greene, Valerie J. Caracelli +1 more
Educational ResearcherQualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research
924 Citations1981David Brinberg, Thomas D. Cook +1 more
Educational ResearcherClosing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers
663 Citations1986John K. Smith, Lous Heshusius
Educational Evaluation and Policy AnalysisData Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
603 Citations1993Valerie J. Caracelli, Jennifer C. Greene
New Directions for Program EvaluationTheory as method: Small theories of treatments
323 Citations1993Mark W. Lipsey
New Directions for Program EvaluationEvaluability assessment: Developing program theory
177 Citations1987Joseph S. Wholey
Evaluability assessment involves key policymakers, managers, and staff in developing program theory and clarifying intended uses of evaluation information, thus helping solve problems that inhibit useful program evaluation.
New Directions for Program EvaluationParadigm wars: A basis for peaceful coexistence and beyond
145 Citations1994Lois‐ellin Datta
New Directions for Program EvaluationIntegrating the quantitative and qualitative
91 Citations1994Ernest R. House
One way of resolving the quantitative versus qualitative methods dispute is to recognize that evaluation has a special content and that this content is more important than the methodologies.
Evaluation PracticeThe arts and sciences of program evaluation
60 Citations1991Yvonna Sessions Lincoln
New Directions for Program EvaluationAlternative models for the use of multiple methods
58 Citations1987Melvin M. Mark, R. Lance Shotland
Different models can be followed in using multiple methods, and researchers need to be aware of the benefits associated with different approaches.
Journal of Policy Analysis and ManagementDeregulating the Public Service: Can Government Be Improved?
43 Citations1995Michael Barzelay, John J. DiIulio
New Directions for Program EvaluationTaking uncertainty into account when estimating effects
36 Citations1987Charles S. Reichardt, Harry F. Gollob
New Directions for Program EvaluationThe quantitative‐qualitative debate: Possibilities for integration
31 Citations1994Terry E. Hedrick
