Online Reputation Management

Abstract

Failure to meet a consumer's expectations can result in a negative review, which can have a lasting, damaging impact on a firm's reputation, and its ability to attract new customers. To mitigate the reputational harm of negative reviews many firms now publicly respond to them. How effective is this reputation management strategy in improving a firm's reputation? We empirically answer this question by exploiting a difference in managerial practice across two hotel review platforms, TripAdvisor and Expedia: while hotels regularly respond to their TripAdvisor reviews, they almost never do so on Expedia. Based on this observation, we use difference-in-differences to identify the causal impact of management responses on consumer ratings by comparing changes in the TripAdvisor ratings of a hotel following its decision to begin responding against a baseline of changes in the same hotel's Expedia ratings. We find that responding hotels, which account for 56% of hotels in our data, see an average increase of 0.12 stars in the TripAdvisor ratings they receive after they start responding. Moreover, we show that this increase in ratings does not arise from hotel quality investments. Instead, we find that the increase is consistent with a shift in reviewer selection: consumers with a poor experience become less likely to leave a negative review when hotels begin responding.