Employee Ingratiation: The Role of Management
Academy of Management ReviewPublished 1 July 1985
David A. Ralston
Citations105
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score14.40
SNIP6.11
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Ingratiation, a political process to seek one's own self-interest, may be detrimental to an organization if it becomes excessive. Traditionally, ingratiation has been viewed as a set of individually-initiated behaviors. This paper attempts to show that ingratiation is organizationally induced as well as individually initiated and that it is the interaction of these two forces that determines the amount of ingratiatory behavior in an organization. A set of potentially testable propositions regarding causes of ingratiation is developed and discussed.
Keywords
Social SciencesBusiness, Management and AccountingPhysics and Astronomy
Administrative Science QuarterlyHandbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
12,139 Citations1977Tove Helland Hammer, John F. Anderson +7 more
Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewMen and Women of the Corporation.
7,350 Citations1978George Strauss, Rosabeth Moss Kanter
The Journal of Social PsychologyPatterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates”
3,214 Citations1939Kurt Lewin, Ronald Lippitt +1 more
Academy of Management JournalOn the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B.
1,560 Citations1975S. Kerr
Administrative Science QuarterlyA Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power
1,382 Citations1971David J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings +3 more
Journal of Applied PsychologyIntraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way.
1,330 Citations1980David Kipnis, Stuart M. Schmidt +1 more
Administrative Science QuarterlyThe Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University
705 Citations1974Gerald R. Salancik, Jeffrey Pfeffer
Administrative Science QuarterlySources of Power of Lower Participants in Complex Organizations
655 Citations1962David Mechanic
Academy of Management JournalThe Experience of Workplace Politics.
548 Citations1980Jeffrey Gandz, Víctor Murray
California Management ReviewOrganizational Politics
296 Citations1979Robert W. Allen, Dan L. Madison +3 more
Human RelationsOrganizational Politics: An Exploration of Managers' Perceptions
250 Citations1980Dan L. Madison, Robert W. Allen +3 more
Administrative Science QuarterlyTechnology and the Structure of Subunits: Distinguishing Individual and Workgroup Effects
155 Citations1977Donald E. Comstock, W. Richard Scott
Administrative Science QuarterlyJob Technology, Supervision, and Work-Group Structure
139 Citations1974Lawrence G. Hrebiniak
Human RelationsDeterminants of Supervisory Behavior: A Role Set Analysis
118 Citations1975Jeffrey Pfeffer, Gerald R. Salancik
Administrative Science QuarterlyAn Empirical Study of the Technology of Nursing Subunits
108 Citations1977Peggy Overton, Rodney Schneck +1 more
The purpose of this study was to describe and differentiate empirically the technology of seven types of nursing subunits in hospitals.
Academy of Management ReviewIndividual Power and Political Behaviors in Organizations: An Inadequately Explored Reality<sup />
105 Citations1977Virginia E. Schein
The Journal of Social PsychologyMachiavellianism and Ingratiation
64 Citations1979Janak Pandey, Renu Rastogi
Internet Archive (Internet Archive)A business and its beliefs : the ideas that helped build I.BM
55 Citations2003Thomas J. Watson
Journal of Occupational PsychologyA note about social power through ingratiation among workers
38 Citations1981Janak Pandey
