Argumentativeness: Japanese and American tendencies to approach and avoid conflict
Communication Research ReportsPublished 1 June 1990
Alicia M. Prunty, Donald W. Klopf, Satoshi Ishii
Citations33
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.68
SNIP0.80
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract The Japanese allegedly are disinclined to argue. This study supports that allegation. Japanese university students were compared to American students using the Infante/ Rancer Argumentativeness Scale. The scale measures tendencies to approach arguments and to avoid them. Additionally it indicates the general argumentativeness trait of respondents. The Japanese were significantly less inclined to approach argument situations and had a significantly weaker argumentativeness trait than the Americans. No significant difference appeared for avoiding arguments.
Keywords
PsychologyArts and Humanities
PsychometrikaCoefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
43,211 Citations1951Lee J. Cronbach
Journal of Personality AssessmentA Conceptualization and Measure of Argumentativeness
462 Citations1982Dominic A. Infante, Andrew S. Rancer
A 20-item, self-report scale was developed in a series of three factor analytic studies and a hypothesis was supported which posited response to a particular argument would be predicted better by trait and state components together than by the trait component alone.
Explorations in interpersonal communication
456 Citations1976Gerald R. Miller
International Journal of Intercultural RelationsReasons for the lack of argumentation and debate in the Far East
119 Citations1986Carl Becker
Human Communication ResearchSUPERIORS' ARGUMENTATIVENESS AND VERBAL AGGRESSIVENESS AS PREDICTORS OF SUBORDINATES' SATISFACTION
110 Citations1985Dominic A. Infante, William I. Gorden
Communication QuarterlyArgumentativeness and affirming communicator style as predictors of satisfaction/dissatisfaction with subordinates
107 Citations1989Dominic A. Infante, William I. Gorden
Central States Speech JournalTrait argumentativeness as a predictor of communicative behavior in situations requiring argument
85 Citations1981Dominic A. Infante
Southern Communication JournalResponse to high argumentatives: Message and sex differences
47 Citations1989Dominic A. Infante
Communication QuarterlyArgumentativeness: Its effect in group decision‐making and its role in leadership perception
46 Citations1982Beatrice Schultz
Quarterly Journal of SpeechThe Japanese patterns of communication and the concept of<i>amae</i>
41 Citations1973L. Takeo Doi
Communication Research ReportsArgumentativeness, Verbal Aggressiveness and Marital Satisfaction
33 Citations1986Andrew S. Rancer, Robert A. Baukus +1 more
Asian SurveyDecision Models and Japanese Foreign Policy Decision Making
10 Citations1985Michael Minor
Otsuma reviewA Comparison of the Assertiveness : Responsiveness Construct Between Japanese and Americans
10 Citations1989Satoshi Ishii, Catherine A. Thompson +1 more
Asian SurveyDecision Models and Japanese Foreign Policy Decision Making
5 Citations1985Michael S. Minor
