Personalization and Offers of Results
The Journal of Experimental EducationPublished 1 April 1989
Kathy E. Green, Robert F. Kvidahl
Citations14
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.10
SNIP1.64
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated the effects of personalization, an offer of survey results, gender, level taught, and location (state) on survey return rates. Six hundred surveys were mailed to public school teachers in Nebraska and Wyoming. The overall return rate was 70.5%. A significant main effect was found for personalization. Also, personalization increased responses to the initial mailing. No other effects were necessary to provide adequate model fit. Results suggest personalization as operationalized in this study to be effective in increasing returns.
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
26,054 Citations1980Icek Ajzen, Martin Fishbein
American Sociological ReviewFactors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature
1,005 Citations1978Thomas A. Heberlein, Robert Baumgartner
Journal of Marketing ResearchMail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review
859 Citations1975Leslie Lazar Kanuk, Conrad Berenson
American Sociological ReviewFurther Evidence on Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires
130 Citations1982John Goyder
Research in Higher EducationFeedback as an incentive for responding to a mail questionnaire
33 Citations1982Donald E. Powers, Donald L. Alderman
New Directions for Program EvaluationImproving mailed questionnaires: Analysis of a 96 percent return rate
23 Citations1984James W. Altschuld, Michael A. Lower
Educational and Psychological MeasurementPersonalization of Mail Surveys: Too Much of a Good Thing?
22 Citations1984Margaret Rucker, Rhonda Hughes +3 more
The Journal of Experimental EducationThe Effects of Personalization, Sex, Locale, and Level Taught on Educators’ Responses to a Mail Survey
20 Citations1986Kathy E. Green, Susan F. Stager
Teacher Education Follow-up Surveys: Variables Related to Response Rate.
5 Citations1987Judith A. Boser
New Directions for Program EvaluationApplying attitude theories to the return of mailed questionnaires
3 Citations1984Jack McKillip
