Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain.

The authors reanalyze data from French et al. using a procedure described by J. R. Edwards (in press) that avoids problems with difference scores and captures the underlying three-dimensional relationship between E, P, and strain.

Abstract

The most influential study of the person-environment (P-E) fit approach to stress was conducted by J. R. P. French, R. D. Caplan, and R. V. Harrison (1982). Unfortunately, this study operationalized fit using various transformations of difference scores, thereby introducing numerous substantive and methodological problems. In the present study, the authors reanalyze data from French et al., using a procedure described by J. R. Edwards (in press) that avoids problems with difference scores and captures the underlying three-dimensional relationship between E, P, and strain. Results resolve ambiguities in the French et al. findings and identify relationships between E, P, and strain that, although consistent with P-E fit theory, cannot be adequately represented by fit measures such as those used by French et al. Implications for P-E fit research are discussed.