“Marketing Strategy and Differential Advantage”: A Comment
Journal of MarketingPublished 1 March 1985
Amitava Chattopadhyay, Prakash Nedungadi, Dipankar Chakravarti
Citations14
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score13.39
SNIP5.22
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This article critiques the “new paradigm of marketing strategies” proposed by Cook (JM, Spring 1983). It is shown that his formulation of the strategic marketing ambition and differential advantage concepts does not provide general or actionable links between a firm's market performance goals and its marketing mix decisions. The consequent limitations of Cook's framework are discussed, and alternative formulations that may overcome these limitations are suggested.
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
Management ScienceModels and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus
816 Citations2004John D. C. Little
A model consists of a set of numerical procedures for processing data and judgments to assist managerial decision making and so will be called a decision calculus and an example from marketing is described.
Management ScienceModels and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus
789 Citations1970John D. C. Little
Journal of Marketing ResearchParameter Estimation for a Multiplicative Competitive Interaction Model—Least Squares Approach
422 Citations1974Masao Nakanishi, Lee G. Cooper
Operations ResearchFeature Article—Aggregate Advertising Models: The State of the Art
372 Citations1979John D. C. Little
A review of aggregate models developed on a priori grounds brings out similarities and differences among those of Vidale and Wolfe, Nerlove and Arrow, Little, and others and identifies ways in which the models agree or disagree with observed phenomena.
Operations ResearchBRANDAID: A Marketing-Mix Model, Part 1: Structure
211 Citations1975John D. C. Little
BRANDAID is a flexible, on-line model for assembling these elements to describe the market and evaluate strategies that motivates the model and presents its mathematics.
Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systemsA Market Share Theorem
204 Citations1976David E. Bell, Ralph L. Keeney +1 more
Journal of Marketing ResearchOn the Prediction Power of Market Share Attraction Models
114 Citations1981Ph. Naert, Marcel Weverbergh
Journal of MarketingJudgment Based Marketing Decision Models: Problems and Possible Solutions
87 Citations1981Dipankar Chakravarti, Andrew A. Mitchell +1 more
Journal of Marketing ResearchLogically Consistent Market Share Models
81 Citations1973Philippe A. Naert, Alain Bultez
Journal of MarketingCommentary on “Judgment Based Marketing Decision Models”
43 Citations1981John D. C. Little, Leonard M. Lodish
A number of conclusions about judgment based models that agree with field experience are drawn, however, it is questioned whether their experiments form an adequate basis for ascribing negative effects to decision calculus models.
Journal of Marketing ResearchLogically Consistent Market Share Models II
26 Citations1976Timothy W. McGuire, Doyle L. Weiss
