A Demonstration of Hindsight Bias Using the Thomas Confirmation Vote
Psychological ReportsPublished 1 April 1993
Dorothee Dietrich, Matthew H. Olson
Citations15
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.76
SNIP0.91
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The Clarence Thomas confirmation vote provided an opportunity to demonstrate hindsight bias in a repeated-measures design using an ongoing political event. The 57 subjects displayed statistically significant memory distortions in recalling a higher number of confirming senatorial votes when asked one month after the vote to recall the estimate they had provided the day before the vote.
Keywords
Social SciencesDecision Sciences
International Journal of ForecastingOrganizational behavior and human decision processes
1,775 Citations1988J. Scott Armstrong
Organizational Behavior and Human PerformanceI knew it would happen
689 Citations1975Baruch Fischhoff, Ruth Beyth
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesReduction of hindsight bias by restoration of foresight perspective: Effectiveness of foresight-encoding and hindsight-retrieval strategies
70 Citations1987Martin F. Davies
Journal of Applied Social PsychologyHindsight Distortion: “I knew‐it‐all along and I was sure about it”<sup>1</sup>
47 Citations1986Nicolaos E. Synodinos
