Sample Composition Bias and Response Bias in a Mail Survey: A Comparison of Inducement Methods
Journal of Marketing ResearchPublished 1 February 1980
Wesley H. Jones, James R. Lang
Citations73
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.96
SNIP2.42
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Inducement techniques that increase mail questionnaire response rates do not necessarily improve the precision of survey results. An experimental investigation of sponsorship, cover letter message, notification method, and questionnaire format was performed. Treatment conditions that influenced response rate were found to cause two types of systematic bias that can reduce survey accuracy.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyCompliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.
1,582 Citations1966Jonathan L. Freedman, Scott C. Fraser
Significant evidence is produced that greater external pressure generally leads to greater compliance with the wishes of the experimenter, and the one exception appears to be situations involving the arousal of cognitive dissonance.
American Sociological ReviewFactors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature
1,005 Citations1978Thomas A. Heberlein, Robert Baumgartner
Journal of Marketing ResearchMail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review
859 Citations1975Leslie Lazar Kanuk, Conrad Berenson
Recent research in psychologyResponse Effects in Surveys
523 Citations1987Hans‐J. Hippler, Norbert Schwarz
Public Opinion QuarterlyStimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review
401 Citations1975Arnold S. Linsky
Journal of Marketing ResearchMail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review
248 Citations1975Leslie Lazar Kanuk, Conrad Berenson
American Sociological ReviewIncreasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four State Comparison
198 Citations1974Don A. Dillman, James A. Christenson +2 more
Public Opinion QuarterlyImplications of Nonresponse for the Interpretation of Mail Questionnaire Data
136 Citations1960Marjorie N. Donald
Social ForcesQuestionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological Analysis
117 Citations1969D. J. Champion, Alan M. Sear
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationNote on Owner's Estimate of Housing Value
113 Citations1972John F. Kain, John M. Quigley
Journal of Marketing ResearchBroadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys
103 Citations1976Michael J. Houston, Neil M. Ford
Journal of Marketing ResearchThe Effects of Source and Appeal on Mail Survey Response Patterns
99 Citations1977Michael J. Houston, John R. Nevin
Land EconomicsA Hedonic Model of Prices and Assessments for Single-Family Homes: Does the Assessor Follow the Market or the Market Follow the Assessor?
94 Citations1975Brian J. L. Berry, Robert S. Bednarz
Journal of Marketing ResearchCompliance with an Interview Request: A Foot-in-the-Door, Self-Perception Interpretation
86 Citations1977Peter H. Reingen, Jerome B. Kernan
Journal of Marketing ResearchMultiple Criteria Effects in a Mail Survey Experiment
84 Citations1978Wesley H. Jones, Gerald Linda
Journal of Business ResearchAn experimental investigation of mail-survey responses
74 Citations1975Robert A. Peterson
Public Opinion QuarterlyGeneralizing Mail Survey Inducement Methods: Population Interactions With Anonymity and Sponsorship
44 Citations1979Wesley H. Jones
Journal of Marketing ResearchIncentives to Increase Survey Returns: Social Class Considerations
32 Citations1975Betsy D. Gelb
