login

Tobacco industry litigation strategies to oppose tobacco control media campaigns

Tobacco ControlPublished 24 January 2006Open access
Jennifer Ibrahim, Stanton A. Glantz
Citations43
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.31
SNIP1.65
View PDF

TL;DR

The tobacco industry has expanded its efforts to oppose tobacco control media campaigns through litigation strategies and tobacco control professionals need to anticipate these challenges and be prepared to defend against them.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the tobacco industry's litigation strategy to impede tobacco control media campaigns. METHODS: Data were collected from news and reports, tobacco industry documents, and interviews with health advocates and media campaign staff. RESULTS: RJ Reynolds and Lorillard attempted to halt California's Media Campaign alleging that the campaign polluted jury pools and violated First Amendment rights because they were compelled to pay for anti-industry ads. The American Legacy Foundation was accused of violating the Master Settlement Agreement's vilification clause because its ads attacked the tobacco industry. The tobacco companies lost these legal challenges. CONCLUSION: The tobacco industry has expanded its efforts to oppose tobacco control media campaigns through litigation strategies. While litigation is a part of tobacco industry business, it imposes a financial burden and impediment to media campaigns' productivity. Tobacco control professionals need to anticipate these challenges and be prepared to defend against them.

Keywords

MedicinePharmacology, Toxicology and PharmaceuticsBusiness, Management and Accounting