The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
It is suggested that excluding reports of RCTs in LOE from the analytical part of a systematic review is reasonable, and language inclusive/LOE systematic reviews appear to be a marker for a better quality systematic review.
Abstract
With the exception of CAM systematic reviews, the quality of recently published systematic reviews is less than optimal. Language inclusive/LOE systematic reviews appear to be a marker for a better quality systematic review. Language restrictions do not appear to bias the estimates of a conventional intervention's effectiveness. However, there is substantial bias in the results of a CAM systematic review if LOE reports are excluded from it.
