Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response.

A comparison of performance with compatible, incompatible, and neutral conditions shows that when a stimulus set is perceptually, conceptually, or structurally similar to a response set, mean reaction times are faster when individual stimuli and responses match than when they do not match.

Abstract

Five experiments were conducted using 4- and 6-choice stimulus-response compatibility tasks with graphic and alphabetic stimuli, and keypress and verbal responses. A comparison of performance with compatible, incompatible, and neutral conditions shows that when a stimulus set is perceptually, conceptually, or structurally similar to a response set, (a) mean reaction times (RTs) are faster when individual stimuli and responses match than when they do not match, (b) this is true whether the stimulus and response sets are similar on relevant or irrelevant dimensions, (c) this "compatibility effect" is greater when the dimensions are relevant than when they are irrelevant, and (d) whether the dimensions are relevant or irrelevant, the faster RTs are due to a facilitative process and the slower RTs to an interfering process. These results are accounted for by the dimensional overlap model.