Response Function Estimation Using the Equity Estimator
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Overall, equity outperforms the other three estimators on criteria such as estimated bias, variance, and face validity of the estimates, and some managerial implications for resource allocation in the pharmaceutical industry are presented.
Abstract
Multicollinearity often hampers the estimation of the “independent” effects of the marketing mix variables in sales response models. In a previous study, the authors recommended the use of the equity estimator for estimating linear models in the presence of multicollinearity. In this article, they evaluate the performance of equity, ridge, OLS, and principal components estimators in estimating response functions for 36 pharmaceutical products. Overall, equity outperforms the other three estimators on criteria such as estimated bias, variance, and face validity of the estimates. The four estimators have similar levels of predictive accuracy. The authors also present some managerial implications for resource allocation in the pharmaceutical industry.
