Theory–data interaction from the standpoint of scientific realism: a reaction to bostrom
Communication MonographsPublished 1 September 2004
Charles Pavitt
Citations5
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.02
SNIP1.36
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This author is in general agreement with the arguments in Bostrom's () essay concerning theory–data interaction. Nevertheless, an examination of the issues raised in the essay from the standpoint of scientific realism lead to two different conclusions. First, the opening rationale is based on a nondefensible distinction between empiricists and interpretivists. Second, debates among paradigms are based on real ontological and epistemological differences, and the scientific realist's view of theory–data interaction accepts the validity of these differences.
Keywords
Computer ScienceArts and HumanitiesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Physics Today<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
35,519 Citations1963Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel
Language<b>Verbal behavior.</b> By B. F. Skinner. (The Century Psychology Series.) Pp. viii, 478. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1957.
3,358 Citations1959Noam Chomsky
Human Communication ResearchPredicted Outcome Value During Initial Interactions A Reformulation of Uncertainty Reduction Theory
256 Citations1986Michael Sunnafrank
Human Communication ResearchUncertain Outcome Values in Predicted Relationships Uncertainty Reduction Theory Then and Now
182 Citations1986Charles R. Berger
Communication TheoryThe Third Way: Scientific Realism and Communication Theory
54 Citations1999Charles Pavitt
Western Journal of Speech CommunicationOn whether one can(not) not communicate: An examination via traditional communication postulates
46 Citations1990Michael T. Motley
This paper reviews four traditional communication postulates, that communication is interactive, involves encoding, involves the exchange of symbols, and has a fidelity dimension‐and finds each to be a contradiction of the popular axiom.
Western Journal of Speech CommunicationBehaving and communicating: A reply to Motley
31 Citations1990Janet Beavin Bavelas
Communication TheoryAnswering Questions Requesting Scientific Explanations for Communication
29 Citations2000Charles Pavitt
Annals of the International Communication AssociationRelational Coding Schemes: The Question of Validity
28 Citations1981Joseph P. Folger, Marshall Scott Poole
Quarterly Journal of SpeechAttitude‐behavior relationships in communication research
8 Citations1976Thomas M. Steinfatt, Dominic A. Infante
