Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study
BMJPublished 16 November 2007Open access
Veronica Yank, Drummond Rennie, Lisa Bero
Citations232
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Meta-analyses on antihypertensive drugs and with financial ties to one drug company are not associated with favourable results but are associated with favorable conclusions.
Abstract
Meta-analyses on antihypertensive drugs and with financial ties to one drug company are not associated with favourable results but are associated with favourable conclusions.
Keywords
Decision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and FinancePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
BiometricsThe Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
78,934 Citations1977J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch
A general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies is presented and tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interob server agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics.
Controlled Clinical TrialsAssessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
17,565 Citations1996Alejandro R. Jadad, R Andrew Moore +5 more
An instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research is described and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality is described.
The LancetDoes quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
3,591 Citations1998David Moher, Ba’ Pham +6 more
Study of low methodological quality in which the estimate of quality is incorporated into the meta-analyses can alter the interpretation of the benefit of intervention, whether a scale or component approach is used in the assessment of trial quality.
The LancetPublication bias in clinical research
3,095 Citations1991Philippa Easterbrook, Radha Gopalan +2 more
The presence of publication bias in a cohort of clinical research studies is confirmed and it is suggested that conclusions based only on a review of published data should be interpreted cautiously, especially for observational studies.
BMJPharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
2,163 Citations2003Joel Lexchin, Lisa A Bero +2 more
Investigating whether funding of drug studies by the pharmaceutical industry is associated with outcomes that are favourable to the funder and whether the methods of trials funded by pharmaceutical companies differ from the methods in trials with other sources of support found systematic bias favours products which are made by the company funding the research.
JAMAScope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research
1,803 Citations2003Justin E. Bekelman, Yan Li +1 more
Original, quantitative studies on the extent, impact, and management of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research are reviewed to show a statistically significant association between industry sponsorship and pro-industry conclusions.
BMJA new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines
1,612 Citations2001Robin Harbour, John Miller
A revised system of determining levels of evidence and grades for guideline recommendations is published, based on the work of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and its applicability to the target population of the guideline.
RadiologyMeasurement of Observer Agreement
1,486 Citations2003Harold L. Kundel, Marcia Polansky
The review concentrates on the chance-corrected indices, kappa and weighted kappa, which are used in diagnostic imaging for expressing observer agreement in regard to categorical data.
New England Journal of MedicineBias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical Trials
879 Citations1983Thomas C. Chalmers, Paul Celano +2 more
Differences in case-fatality rates between treatment and control groups were found, and the importance of keeping those who recruit patients for clinical trials from suspecting which treatment will be assigned to the patient under consideration is emphasized.
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyValidation of an index of the quality of review articles
789 Citations1991Andrew D Oxman, Gordon Guyatt
The OQAQ is a valid measure of the quality of research overviews and the primary shortcoming noted was the need for judgement in applying the index.
JAMAAssociation of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug Trials
744 Citations2003Bodil Als‐Nielsen, Wendong Chen +2 more
Conclusions in trials funded by for-profit organizations may be more positive due to biased interpretation of trial results, and readers should carefully evaluate whether conclusions in randomized trials are supported by data.
JAMAComposite Outcomes in Randomized Trials
725 Citations2003Nick Freemantle, Melanie Calvert +3 more
It is suggested that current guidelines for the undertaking and reporting of clinical trials could be revised to reflect the common use of composite outcomes in clinical trials, as well as the arguments for and against them.
New England Journal of MedicineConflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists
620 Citations1998Henry T. Stelfox, Grace Chua +2 more
The LancetCompleteness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews
538 Citations1996David Moher, Paul R. Fortin +7 more
These results provide evidence for inclusion of all trial reports, irrespective of the language in which they are published, in systematic reviews, likely to increase precision and may reduce systematic errors.
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologySelecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?
534 Citations1995Geneviève Grégoire, François Derderian +1 more
This study demonstrates that, in at least one out of 36 consecutive meta-analyses the exclusion of papers for linguistic reasons produced results different from those which would have been obtained if this exclusion criteria had not been used.
The LancetDoes blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses?
483 Citations1997Jesse A. Berlin
JAMAEvaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in Oncology
480 Citations1999Mark W. Friedberg
Findings indicate that pharmaceutical company sponsorship of economic analyses is associated with reduced likelihood of reporting unfavorable results.
JAMARelative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences
479 Citations2005Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos
New England Journal of MedicineParticipation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry
471 Citations1996David Blumenthal, Eric G. Campbell +2 more
BMJCochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review
442 Citations2006Anders W Jørgensen, Jørgen Hilden +1 more
Industry supported reviews of drugs should be read with caution as they were less transparent, had few reservations about methodological limitations of the included trials, and had more favourable conclusions than the corresponding Cochrane reviews.
BMJAssociation between competing interests and authors' conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ
432 Citations2002Lise Lotte Kjaergard, Bodil Als-Nielsen
Authors' conclusions in randomised clinical trials significantly favoured experimental interventions if financial competing interests were declared, and were significantly more positive towards the experimental intervention in trials funded by for profit organisations alone compared with trials without competing interests.
JAMAWhy Review Articles on the Health Effects of Passive Smoking Reach Different Conclusions
430 Citations1998Deborah E. Barnes
The conclusions of review articles on the health effects of passive smoking are strongly associated with the affiliations of their authors, and readers should consider authors' affiliations when deciding how to judge an article's conclusions.
Statistics in MedicineHeterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses
363 Citations2000Eric A. Engels, Christopher H. Schmid +3 more
This work studied 125 meta-analyses representative of those performed by clinical investigators to examine empirically how assessment of treatment effect and heterogeneity may differ when different methods are utilized, and presents two exceptions to these observations.
Controlled Clinical TrialsMethodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
336 Citations1989Peter C Gøtzsche
Important design aspects were decreasingly reported in NSAID trials over the years, whereas the quality of statistical analysis improved, and it is not obvious how a reliable meta-analysis could be done in these trials.
Annals of Internal MedicineThe Quality of Drug Studies Published in Symposium Proceedings
333 Citations1996Mildred K. Cho, Lisa A. Bero
If symposia sponsored by drug companies are a growing source of information about drugs for pharmacists and physicians, assessing the quality of the articles in these symposium is important, and the methodologic quality and relevance of drug studies published in symposiums with those of studies that were published in Symphony that had other sponsors or in the peer-reviewed parent journals are compared.
BMJSystematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation
258 Citations2000Alejandro R. Jadad
Most reviews published in peer reviewed journals or funded by industry have serious methodological flaws that limit their value to guide decisions, but Cochrane reviews are more rigorous and better reported than those published inpeer reviewed journals.
PLoS MedicineFactors Associated with Findings of Published Trials of Drug–Drug Comparisons: Why Some Statins Appear More Efficacious than Others
247 Citations2007Lisa Bero, Fieke Oostvogel +2 more
Associations between research funding source, study design characteristics aimed at reducing bias, and other factors that potentially influence results and conclusions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statin–drug comparisons are examined.
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyMeta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology
208 Citations1996Alejandro R. Jadad, Henry J McQuay
Ninety percent of the meta-analyses had methodological flaws that could limit their validity and the main deficiencies were lack of information on methods to retrieve and to assess the validity of primary studies and lack of data on the design of the primary studies.
New England Journal of MedicineThe Publication of Sponsored Symposiums in Medical Journals
170 Citations1992Lisa Bero, Alison Galbraith +1 more
Symposiums sponsored by drug companies often have promotional attributes and are not peer-reviewed, and financial relations among symposium participants, sponsors, and journals should be completely disclosed, symposiums should be clearly identified, and journal editors should maintain editorial control over contributions.
The LancetAccuracy of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals
166 Citations2003Pilar Villanueva, Salvador Peiró +2 more
Doctors should be cautious in assessment of advertisements that claim a drug has greater efficacy, safety, or convenience, even though these claims are accompanied by bibliographical references to randomised clinical trials published in reputable medical journals and seem to be evidence-based.
JAMAEvaluating the Quality of Articles Published in Journal Supplements Compared With the Quality of Those Published in the Parent Journal
135 Citations1994Paula A. Rochon
It is suggested that randomized control trials published in journal supplements are generally of inferior quality compared with articles published in the parent journal.
Statistics in MedicineMeta‐analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. II: Replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree
124 Citations1987Thomas C. Chalmers, Jayne Berrier +4 more
The replicate variability of meta-analyses of controlled clinical trials has been assessed as a measure of scientific precision and further work in this area should include multivariate analyses in order to explore possible interactions in the factors accounting for the variability found in replicate meta-Analyses.
JAMAThe Relationship Between Methodological Quality and Conclusions in Reviews of Spinal Manipulation
122 Citations1995Willem JJ Assendelft
The majority of the reviews concluded that spinal manipulation is an effective treatment for low back pain, and although the reviews with a relatively high methodological quality had a positive conclusion, strong conclusions were precluded by the overall low quality of the Reviews.
JAMALooking a Gift Horse in the Mouth
110 Citations1998Eric G. Campbell, Karen Seashore Louis +1 more
Research-related gifts are a common and important form of research support for academic life scientists, however, recipients frequently think that donors place restrictions and expect returns that may be problematic for recipients as well as institutions.
BMJCommercial influence and the content of medical journals
99 Citations2006Joel Lexchin, Donald W. Light
Science and Engineering EthicsFinancial interests of authors in scientific journals: A pilot study of 14 publications
89 Citations1996Sheldon Krimsky, Leslie Steven Rothenberg +2 more
The frequency of selected financial interests held among authors of certain types of scientific publications and assesses disclosure practices of authors is measured and implications for the new conflict of interest guidelines and disclosure policies are discussed.
Annals of Internal MedicineColloid Use for Fluid Resuscitation: Evidence and Spin
82 Citations2001Deborah Cook, Gordon Guyatt
The results are reassuring only insofar as they fail to show a statistically significant increase in mortality, and point estimates that suggest harm and confidence intervals that include important increases in mortality cannot allay concerns about the potentially harmful effects of albumin.
The LancetAdult night terrors and paroxetine
78 Citations1997DJ Nutt, SJ Wilson +3 more
It is suggested that the terror-suppressing action of paroxetine is a direct effect of its ability to increase 5hydroxytryptamine concentrations in the brainstem by blocking reuptake, and may be as effective as benzodiazepines, although formal comparison is necessary.
Journal of Clinical EpidemiologySensitivity analyses allowed more appropriate and reliable meta-analysis conclusions for multiple outcomes when missing data was present
52 Citations2004Richard D Riley, Alex J. Sutton +2 more
Annals of Internal MedicineClinical Implications of Recent Findings from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment To Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) and Other Studies of Hypertension
49 Citations2001Curt D. Furberg, Bruce M. Psaty +2 more
This paper addresses three questions: Is blood pressure reduction a reliable marker for health benefits of antihypertensive drugs?
JAMAEvaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal
42 Citations1994Paula A. Rochon
JAMARecent Trials in Hypertension
40 Citations2006Bruce M. Psaty, Noel S. Weiss +1 more
In the meta-analyses of placebo-controlled trials in hypertension, the reductions in coronary heart disease risk associated with -blockers have been modest, with 95% CIs that include 1.0.
JAMAThe relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation
30 Citations1995Willem JJ Assendelft
The LancetAre systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?
28 Citations2006Paul Glasziou, Ben Djulbegovic +1 more
American Journal of OphthalmologyAssessing faculty financial relationships with industry: a case study
21 Citations2001E. A. Boyd, Lisa Bero
A growing number of academic researchers receive industry funding for clinical and basic research, but little is known about the personal financial relationships of researchers with their industry sponsors.
Canadian Journal of GastroenterologyA Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review
6 Citations2002John WD McDonald, Jeffrey L. Mahon +4 more
The focused systematic review was perceived to be more useful than a traditional broad narrative review as a guide to making a decision concerning the use of specific therapy.