Survey Response‐Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsPublished 1 May 2000
Mark L. Messonnier, John C. Bergstrom, Christopher Cornwell, R. Jeff Teasley, H. Ken Cordell
Citations65
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.43
SNIP2.03
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract Sample nonresponse and selection biases that may occur in survey research such as contingent valuation applications are discussed and tested. Correction mechanisms for these types of biases are demonstrated. Results indicate the importance of testing and correcting for unit and item nonresponse bias in contingent valuation survey data. When sample nonresponse and selection bias go uncorrected, welfare measures may be overestimated or underestimated contributing to potential errors in resource policy and management decisions.
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and FinanceEnvironmental Science
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the <i>EM</i> Algorithm
49,657 Citations1977A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird +1 more
The Economic JournalEstimation and Inference in Econometrics.
5,587 Citations1994Marcus J. Chambers, Russell Davidson +1 more
Choice Reviews OnlineUsing surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method
4,247 Citations1989Price, Raymond
American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsWelfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses
2,797 Citations1984W. Michael Hanemann
Journal of Agricultural and Applied EconomicsDiscovering Niche Markets: A Comparison of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local (Colorado Grown), Organic, and GMO-Free Products
511 Citations2002María L. Loureiro, Susan Hine
A MISSING INFORMATION PRINCIPLE: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
456 Citations1972Terence Orchard, Max A. Woodbury
The problem that a relatively simple analysis is changed into a complex one just because some of the information is missing, is one which faces most practicing statisticians at some point in their career.
AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)ASSESSING CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR ORGANIC, ECO-LABELED, AND REGULAR APPLES
358 Citations2001María L. Loureiro, Jill J. McCluskey +4 more
Economics LettersTesting for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation
193 Citations1993John C. Whitehead, Peter A. Groothuis +1 more
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationAlternative Methods for CPS Income Imputation
130 Citations1986Martin David, Roderick J. A. Little +2 more
Growth and ChangeEnvironmental Interest Group Behavior and Self‐Selection Bias in Contingent Valuation Mail Surveys
127 Citations1991John C. Whitehead
Land EconomicsExpanding Contingent Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed Solutions
98 Citations1987John B. Loomis
Leisure SciencesSample bias in contingent valuation: A comparison of the correction methods
15 Citations1994John C. Whitehead, Peter A. Groothuis +2 more
2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, ILAN ANALYSIS OF STATISTICAL ERRORS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS
3 Citations2001Brian Dietz, Dietz, Brian
