Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance
Journal of Marketing ResearchPublished 1 February 1973
Rolph E. Anderson
Citations969
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.96
SNIP2.42
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Four psychological theories are considered in determining the effects of disconfirmed expectations on perceived product performance and consumer satisfaction. Results reveal that too great a gap between high consumer expectations and actual product performance may cause a less favorable evaluation of a product than a somewhat lower level of disparity.
Keywords
Social SciencesBusiness, Management and Accounting
Macat Library eBooksA Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
18,338 Citations2017Léon Festinger, Alexander O’Connor
Journal of Marketing ResearchAn Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction
1,016 Citations1965Richard N. Cardozo
Journal of Abnormal & Social PsychologyAssimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change.
645 Citations1957Carl I. Hovland, O. J. Harvey +1 more
The relationship between the attitude of the recipient and the position advocated in a communication was studied under conditions where a communicator not known to subject presents a point of view on a controversial issue which differs from that of subject by varying amounts.
Journal of Marketing ResearchConsumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product Quality
254 Citations1972Richard W. Olshavsky, John A. Miller
Journal of Marketing ResearchThe Dissonance Model in Post-Decision Product Evaluation
135 Citations1970Joel B. Cohen, Marvin E. Goldberg
Cognitive Dissonance: Five Years Later
118 Citations2017Natalia P. Chapanis, A. Chapanis
Journal of MarketingConsumerism—An Interpretation
70 Citations1970Richard Hobart Buskirk, James T. Rothe
Journal of Marketing ResearchThe Theory of Cognitive Dissonance and Experimental Research
39 Citations1968Sadaomi Oshikawa
The Journal of Social PsychologyAttitude Change and Communication-Attitude Discrepancy
21 Citations1965James O. Whittaker
Journal of MarketingMarketing Notes and Communications: A Replication of the “Shopping List” Study
17 Citations1970Frederick E. Webster, Frederick von Pechmann
Psychological ReportsSome Limitations of Existing Scales in the Measurement of Social Attitudes
13 Citations1965Lutfy N. Diab
The concepts of latitude of acceptance and latitude of rejection developed by Sherif and Hovland, as well as the semantic differential procedure devised by Osgood, are critically evaluated and briefly commented upon in the light of recent research conducted by the writer on attitude measurement.
